The correlational study is aimed at validating the Authenticity Scale in Russian culture. Authenticity is considered a trait responsible for a person’s ability to be oneself. It helps people resist environment pressure and prevent self-alienation, which contributes to maintaining psychological wellbeing. The original Authenticity Scale includes three subscales: Authentic Living, Accepting External Influence, and Self-Alienation. In total, 2,188 respondents (M_{many years} = , SD_age = ; 78.1% female) participated in the survey. The dimensionality of the Authenticity Scale and its measurement invariance across sex, age, and depression rate subgroups was examined with exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses; the original tripartite structure was kept. Convergent validity was tested through correlation analyses with the Warwick-Edinburgh Mental Well-being Scale, the International Positive and Negative Affect Schedule Short-Form, the Centre of Epidemiological Studies-Depression Scale, the Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale, and the Satisfaction with Life Scale. According to the CFA results, the structure of the Russian version differs from the original one slightly (item 1 was moved from the subscale Authentic Living to the subscale Accepting External Influence and item 4 was excluded); however, the modified factor model showed the best absolute and comparative fit statistics [CFI = 0.961, TLI = 0.949, RMSEA = 0.050 (90% CI [0.40; 0.60]) and SRMR = 0.037]. The reliability (McDonald’s Omega) of the Authenticity Scale subscales was satisfactory and ranged from 0.78 to 0.84. It was revealed that youth are more likely to have high scores on Accepting External Influence and Self-Alienation than adults. Men and women did not significantly differ on the sub-scores of Authenticity Scale. Multigroup CFA also showed that Authenticity Scale scores may be biased in people with high levels of clinical depression, in terms of the item intercepts. Authentic Living is positively connected with mental wellbeing, self-esteem, positive affect, satisfaction with life, and negatively with depressive symptoms and negative affect; reverse trends were found for Accepting External Influence and Self-Alienation subscales. The Russian version of the Authenticity Scale is a valid, reliable tool that may be recommended for use in various areas of non-clinical practice.

Inclusion

Personal credibility is one of the most recommended beliefs in the current active and you will altering society in which somebody changes its personal, economic, and educational standing plus identities a few times in their lifetime. To be real, become your self – these intentions and wants are essential for the emotional welfare during the both eudemonic and hedonic meanings (Kernis and you will Goldman, 2006; Smallenbroek et al., 2017; Sutton, 2020).

The fresh Authenticity Size: Recognition inside the Russian Culture

Personal authenticity contributes to additional helpful emotional phenomena, such self-confident affective relationship, personal well-being, higher mind-respect, mercy and you may care about-mercy, and you can psychological controls (Sheldon mais aussi al., 1997; Neff and Suizzo, 2006; Theran, 2010; Boucher, 2011; English and John, 2013; Kifer ainsi que al., 2013; Wickham, 2013; Bochaver mais aussi al., 2019; Zhang ainsi que al., 2019; Yanchenko and Nartova-Bochaver, 2020). Likewise, it is a barrier anywhere between worry and its particular outcomes or a negative mest lojale utenlandske kvinne predictor regarding mental vulnerability (Goldman and you can Kernis, 2002; Satici ainsi que al., 2013). For this reason, this is certainly a good that’s worthy of investigating, calculating, and you can developing.

Within the most general means, authenticity can be described as a person’s power to end up being true to help you themselves, its characteristics, in addition to their life trajectory. It looks to be one of the “troubling” tricky rules, but not, because it can be acquired alone out of any mission requirements and suggests a great large coherence which have a certain individuals attitude or information which might be not necessarily explicit (Jones, 2010). This particular feature away from credibility helps it be tough to analysis the message legitimacy of your own associated gadgets, and you can, thus, very recognition studies are limited to the new investigating divergent authenticity merely. Furthermore, understanding authenticity differs across societies, and for cross-cultural research, a constant and you may credible device capturing the core articles off credibility is required.